Qonnex

意思決定インテリジェンス

Run the business on live numbers, not last month's spreadsheet.

Decisions wait for reports, and reports wait for people. We make the numbers assemble themselves so decisions stop waiting.

The shape of results

Time to spot a cost spike
3 weeks0 day
Weekly reporting effort
14 hours0 hrs
Stockout surprises per quarter
70

From implementations in this area, measured against each client's own baseline.

The problem, in your words

  • Decisions made on gut feel, not data

    The people closest to the decision have the least current information, so experience fills the gap. Experience is good; experience with live numbers is better.

  • Time lost to reporting and data entry

    Somewhere in the company, a capable person spends two days a week making spreadsheets agree with each other instead of doing the job they were hired for.

  • Numbers that disagree depending on the source

    Sales says one number, finance says another, and the meeting that was supposed to decide something spends its hour deciding whose export to trust.

  • Problems discovered weeks after they started

    The cost spike started in week one and surfaced in the month-end review. Everything between those two dates was money leaving quietly.

What we implement

  • Live operational dashboards

    One agreed set of numbers, current every morning, for every owner.

    Reads from the operational tools you already run; the dashboard is a window, not another system to feed.

  • Forecasting

    Demand, cash, and capacity projected from your history and updated as reality moves.

    Built on your own history, in your own units, per location or line as you actually plan.

  • Anomaly alerts

    Cost spikes, stockouts, and unusual patterns surface the day they appear.

    Watches the same live feeds as the dashboards and speaks up on its own.

  • Data foundation

    Sources reconciled once, so every report draws from the same truth.

    Reconciles your sources once, at the foundation, so every number above it agrees.

What improvement looks like

The shape of results from implementations like these, not a promise about yours.

Distribution

Time to spot a cost spike

Spikes surface in a day because the watching is continuous, not scheduled for month-end.

導入前

3 weeks

導入後

1 day

Food & beverage

Weekly reporting effort

Reporting effort goes to zero because the report is a live view, not a weekly assembly job.

導入前

14 hours

導入後

0 hours

Healthcare services

Forecast refresh cycle

Forecasts refresh weekly because they rebuild themselves as new data lands.

導入前

Quarterly

導入後

Weekly

Manufacturing

Stockout surprises per quarter

Stockouts stop surprising because the forecast and the alert see them coming together.

導入前

7

導入後

1

How the first 90 days run

Every engagement is shaped in the analysis, but this is the usual rhythm for this area.

  1. Weeks 1–2

    Baseline the numbers

    We find where every number the business runs on actually comes from, and where the versions disagree.

  2. Weeks 3–6

    One source of truth

    The data foundation reconciles your sources, and the definitions get agreed once, with the people who own them.

  3. Weeks 7–10

    Dashboards go live

    Every owner opens the same numbers every morning, and the weekly assembly job quietly disappears.

  4. Weeks 11–13

    The numbers start talking

    Forecasts refresh on their own and anomaly alerts begin surfacing problems the day they start.

Clear Signals It's Time to Capture Hidden Profitability

  • Two departments report different versions of the same number

  • Someone assembles reports by hand every single week

  • Problems routinely surface weeks after they began

If two of these sound familiar, the analysis will show you what they cost.

無料分析を受ける

FAQs

The questions buyers actually ask before an engagement starts.

Find out what this is worth in your business.

無料分析を受ける

当サイトでは、サイトの利用状況や訪問経路を把握するために分析 Cookie を使用します。厳密に必要なストレージは常に有効です。それ以外は、お選びいただくまで読み込まれません。 Cookie ポリシー